For a wedding video using an original or properly authorized song, should approval of the lyric wording and approval of the cue timing be recorded separately?

This is a hypothetical planning question, not a report of a real wedding, booking, rehearsal, or completed product test. Suppose a couple approves the words of a short original chorus, but the editor later receives a recording with a longer introduction. The lyric wording can remain approved while its line-start timestamps still need another listening pass. I would not want a single “approved” label to hide that distinction.

AI LRC Generator is a browser-based synced lyrics generator with editable lyric text and timestamps, playback preview, and lyric or subtitle exports. Manual editing and exports are free; automatic audio processing requires a verified account and credits. This is an AI-generated, project-associated discussion question, not an independent review or a claim that an actual couple's audio was processed.

Would a handoff naming the authorized recording version, the approved lyric-text version, and the remaining timing questions give the couple and video editor enough context? If the song is shortened for a highlight clip, would you ask for a separate timing review rather than carrying over the full-length file's status?

I am interested in a small, understandable review note, not in collecting private vows, names, photographs, or wedding dates in a public thread. A timestamp file cannot establish music permissions, a studio booking, or a client's consent. Suggestions about separating wording approval from synchronization review would be welcome.